<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salvomolinaro.com &#187; nikkor</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salvomolinaro.com/tag/nikkor/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salvomolinaro.com</link>
	<description>photography and my other passions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 15:06:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Il motore di autofocus nel corpo della macchina, a cosa serve?</title>
		<link>http://www.salvomolinaro.com/2010/05/13/il-motore-di-autofocus-nel-corpo-della-macchina-a-cosa-serve/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salvomolinaro.com/2010/05/13/il-motore-di-autofocus-nel-corpo-della-macchina-a-cosa-serve/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 23:27:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Salvo Molinaro</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Salvo risponde]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[af]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[af-s]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[d5000]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[d7000]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[d90]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nikkor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nikon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salvomolinaro.com/?p=358</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From: henry &#60;xxxxxxxx@libero.it&#62; Subject: Nikon :compro la d5000 o aspetto la d7000 ? Message Body: Ho l&#8217;hobby di creare filmati con Pinnacle e sono proprietario di Nikon F ( la gloriosa) con una serie di obbiettivi Nikkor (28-85-50-200 e zoom Vivitar 28/200),volevo chiederti ma il motore nel corpo macchina a cosa serve? La prossima d7000]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salvomolinaro.com/2010/05/13/il-motore-di-autofocus-nel-corpo-della-macchina-a-cosa-serve/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>domanda: su D300 metto un 18mm f:1.4, 18-200vr o 18-105vr?</title>
		<link>http://www.salvomolinaro.com/2010/05/12/domanda-su-d300-metto-un-18mm-f1-4-18-200vr-o-18-105vr/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salvomolinaro.com/2010/05/12/domanda-su-d300-metto-un-18mm-f1-4-18-200vr-o-18-105vr/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 23:43:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Salvo Molinaro</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Salvo risponde]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1.4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[18-105 vr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[50mm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[d300]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grandangolo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nikkor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nikon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[normale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tele]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salvomolinaro.com/?p=356</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From: monica Subject: nikon 18mm 1.4 Message Body: ciao, ho letto il tuo commento davvero esaustivo sul 18-105VR e mi sono trovata completametne d&#8217;accordo. Ne approfitto per chiedere il tuo parere &#8230; rientro nella categoria amanti reflex che descrivi (ho una D300 comprata a singapore che si è appena rotta e spero nella fantomatica garanzia]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salvomolinaro.com/2010/05/12/domanda-su-d300-metto-un-18mm-f1-4-18-200vr-o-18-105vr/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Indeciso tra 16-85 vr nikkor e tamron 17-50 2.8 VC</title>
		<link>http://www.salvomolinaro.com/2010/01/20/indeciso-tra-16-85-vr-nikkor-e-tamron-17-50-2-8-vc/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salvomolinaro.com/2010/01/20/indeciso-tra-16-85-vr-nikkor-e-tamron-17-50-2-8-vc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 03:27:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Salvo Molinaro</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Salvo risponde]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[16 85 vr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[17-50]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nikkor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nikon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tamron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vr]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salvomolinaro.com/?p=350</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Alessandro scrive: Ciao, mi chiamo Alessandro e sono di Agrigento. Desideravo, cortesemente, un consiglio su un mio acquisto che farò a breve tra l&#8217;af-s 16-85 vr nikon ed il 17-50 vc tamron che andrebbero montati su una D5000. Superando il problema delle diverse focali (16 contro i 17 e 85 contro i 50) e luminosità]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salvomolinaro.com/2010/01/20/indeciso-tra-16-85-vr-nikkor-e-tamron-17-50-2-8-vc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tamron 17-50 vc su nikon d300s</title>
		<link>http://www.salvomolinaro.com/2010/01/15/tamron-17-50-vc-su-nikon-d300s/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salvomolinaro.com/2010/01/15/tamron-17-50-vc-su-nikon-d300s/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 23:45:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Salvo Molinaro</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Salvo risponde]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[17-50]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[d300s]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[front focus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nikkor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nikon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[polyphoto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tamron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vc]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salvomolinaro.com/?p=344</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ciao Salvo, ho letto la tua recensione sul tamron in oggetto,ho acquistato un Tamron 17-50 f2.8 VC per nikon (ho una d300),sono un fotoamatore e mi piace fare ritratti, spesso la sera, a casa di amici, ed uso di solito un nikon af-s 50 f1.4,ho acquistato il tamron per avere uno zoom più ampio abbastanza]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salvomolinaro.com/2010/01/15/tamron-17-50-vc-su-nikon-d300s/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Consiglio sul primo obiettivo per reflex aps-c Nikon.</title>
		<link>http://www.salvomolinaro.com/2009/11/20/consiglio-sul-primo-obiettivo-per-reflex-aps-c-nikon/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salvomolinaro.com/2009/11/20/consiglio-sul-primo-obiettivo-per-reflex-aps-c-nikon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 01:35:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Salvo Molinaro</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Salvo risponde]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[35mm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[d300]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[d300s]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[d40]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[d40x]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[d50]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[d60]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[d70]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[d80]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[d90]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[diaframma]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lens]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nikkor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[obiettivo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salvomolinaro.com/?p=122</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[ciao Salvatore!, sono Lillo, non penso abbia la mia email memorizzata su questo indirizzo!.. volevo chiederti che apertura focale e che ceristiche hanno, inclusa la marca di quell&#8217;obbiettivo di 50mm se nn sbaglio!! stavo pensando , a tuo parere &#8211; che di certo saprai meglio di me anche perchè hai piu&#8217; esperienza, è meglio un]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salvomolinaro.com/2009/11/20/consiglio-sul-primo-obiettivo-per-reflex-aps-c-nikon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Recensione &#8211; Nikkor 18-105 vr &#8211; review</title>
		<link>http://www.salvomolinaro.com/2009/09/16/recensione-nikkor-18-105-vr-review/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salvomolinaro.com/2009/09/16/recensione-nikkor-18-105-vr-review/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 21:37:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Salvo Molinaro</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[review]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[105]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[18]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[af-s]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dx]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ed]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nikkor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[recensione]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vr]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salvomolinaro.com/?p=19</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nikkor 18 105 vr 3.5-5.6 Nikkor 18-105 vr 3.5-5.6 review   Questo obiettivo ha visto la luce come kit per la d90, ma grazie alle sue grandi doti di tutto fare si è presto diffuso come un obiettivo di uso comune tra gli appassionati &#8220;entry level&#8221; di casa nikon. Nonostante si tratti di una lente]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salvomolinaro.com/2009/09/16/recensione-nikkor-18-105-vr-review/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
