<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Salvomolinaro.com &#187; Salvo risponde</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.salvomolinaro.com/category/photography/salvo-risponde/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.salvomolinaro.com</link>
	<description>photography and my other passions</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 26 Jul 2010 15:06:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Fotografia sportiva &#8211; D300s o d90? Ed ecco spuntare il TAMRON SP AF 28-75mm f/2,8 XR Di</title>
		<link>http://www.salvomolinaro.com/2010/07/09/fotografia-sportiva-d300s-o-d90-ed-ecco-spuntare-il-tamron-sp-af-28-75mm-f28-xr-di/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salvomolinaro.com/2010/07/09/fotografia-sportiva-d300s-o-d90-ed-ecco-spuntare-il-tamron-sp-af-28-75mm-f28-xr-di/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jul 2010 12:16:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Salvo Molinaro</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Salvo risponde]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salvomolinaro.com/?p=405</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ho ricevuto in questi giorni ho ricevuto due E-Mail, una da parte di Romano ed una da parte di Dmitri che ho deciso di inserire in un unico articolo in quanto entrambe vertono sulla foto sportiva. Inizio rispondendo alla mail di Romano: From: Romano &#60;agostini.romano@alice.it&#62; Subject: foto sportive con tamron 17-50 2.8 vc Message Body:]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salvomolinaro.com/2010/07/09/fotografia-sportiva-d300s-o-d90-ed-ecco-spuntare-il-tamron-sp-af-28-75mm-f28-xr-di/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Kit o tuttofare? (18-55 vr + 55-200 vr o 18-105 vr)</title>
		<link>http://www.salvomolinaro.com/2010/06/24/kit-o-tuttofare-18-55-vr-55-200-vr-o-18-105-vr/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salvomolinaro.com/2010/06/24/kit-o-tuttofare-18-55-vr-55-200-vr-o-18-105-vr/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jun 2010 10:07:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Salvo Molinaro</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Salvo risponde]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[18 55 vr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[18-105 vr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[55 200 vr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[minolta]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nikon d3000]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reflex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sony]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salvomolinaro.com/?p=380</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From: Francesco Russo &#60;XXXXXXX@libero.it&#62; Subject: info nikon D3000 Message Body: ciao navigando su internet ho trovato il tuo contatto, io ho due reflex Minolta a pellicola, vorrei passare al digitale , pur non abbandonando completamente la pellicola . A me piace molto fotografare architettura/scorci cittadini , panorami ; persone solo se posso da molto lontano;]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salvomolinaro.com/2010/06/24/kit-o-tuttofare-18-55-vr-55-200-vr-o-18-105-vr/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Consiglio su acquisto nuova reflex</title>
		<link>http://www.salvomolinaro.com/2010/05/14/consiglio-su-acquisto-nuova-reflex/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salvomolinaro.com/2010/05/14/consiglio-su-acquisto-nuova-reflex/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 08:03:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Salvo Molinaro</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Salvo risponde]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[18-105]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[28-200]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[af]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[d5000]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[d90]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tamron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vr]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salvomolinaro.com/?p=359</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From: giuseppe &#60;XXXXXXX.gm@libero.it&#62; Subject: acquisto reflex Message Body: Ciao, navigando di qua e di la in cerca di una risposta ho trovato il tuo sito (un paesano mi sono detto!) e se possibile vorrei una mano per una scelta. posseggo una vecchia nikon f60 con ottica tamron 28-200 af 3.5-5.6, vorrei acquistare una reflex digitale]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salvomolinaro.com/2010/05/14/consiglio-su-acquisto-nuova-reflex/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Il motore di autofocus nel corpo della macchina, a cosa serve?</title>
		<link>http://www.salvomolinaro.com/2010/05/13/il-motore-di-autofocus-nel-corpo-della-macchina-a-cosa-serve/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salvomolinaro.com/2010/05/13/il-motore-di-autofocus-nel-corpo-della-macchina-a-cosa-serve/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2010 23:27:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Salvo Molinaro</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Salvo risponde]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[history]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[af]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[af-s]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[d5000]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[d7000]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[d90]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nikkor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nikon]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salvomolinaro.com/?p=358</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From: henry &#60;xxxxxxxx@libero.it&#62; Subject: Nikon :compro la d5000 o aspetto la d7000 ? Message Body: Ho l&#8217;hobby di creare filmati con Pinnacle e sono proprietario di Nikon F ( la gloriosa) con una serie di obbiettivi Nikkor (28-85-50-200 e zoom Vivitar 28/200),volevo chiederti ma il motore nel corpo macchina a cosa serve? La prossima d7000]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salvomolinaro.com/2010/05/13/il-motore-di-autofocus-nel-corpo-della-macchina-a-cosa-serve/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>domanda: su D300 metto un 18mm f:1.4, 18-200vr o 18-105vr?</title>
		<link>http://www.salvomolinaro.com/2010/05/12/domanda-su-d300-metto-un-18mm-f1-4-18-200vr-o-18-105vr/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salvomolinaro.com/2010/05/12/domanda-su-d300-metto-un-18mm-f1-4-18-200vr-o-18-105vr/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 May 2010 23:43:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Salvo Molinaro</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Salvo risponde]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[1.4]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[18-105 vr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[50mm]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[d300]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[grandangolo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nikkor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nikon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[normale]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tele]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salvomolinaro.com/?p=356</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[From: monica Subject: nikon 18mm 1.4 Message Body: ciao, ho letto il tuo commento davvero esaustivo sul 18-105VR e mi sono trovata completametne d&#8217;accordo. Ne approfitto per chiedere il tuo parere &#8230; rientro nella categoria amanti reflex che descrivi (ho una D300 comprata a singapore che si è appena rotta e spero nella fantomatica garanzia]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salvomolinaro.com/2010/05/12/domanda-su-d300-metto-un-18mm-f1-4-18-200vr-o-18-105vr/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Indeciso tra 16-85 vr nikkor e tamron 17-50 2.8 VC</title>
		<link>http://www.salvomolinaro.com/2010/01/20/indeciso-tra-16-85-vr-nikkor-e-tamron-17-50-2-8-vc/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salvomolinaro.com/2010/01/20/indeciso-tra-16-85-vr-nikkor-e-tamron-17-50-2-8-vc/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 03:27:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Salvo Molinaro</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Salvo risponde]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[16 85 vr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[17-50]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nikkor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nikon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tamron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vc]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vr]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salvomolinaro.com/?p=350</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Alessandro scrive: Ciao, mi chiamo Alessandro e sono di Agrigento. Desideravo, cortesemente, un consiglio su un mio acquisto che farò a breve tra l&#8217;af-s 16-85 vr nikon ed il 17-50 vc tamron che andrebbero montati su una D5000. Superando il problema delle diverse focali (16 contro i 17 e 85 contro i 50) e luminosità]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salvomolinaro.com/2010/01/20/indeciso-tra-16-85-vr-nikkor-e-tamron-17-50-2-8-vc/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Consiglio sul passaggio a reflex, conviene?</title>
		<link>http://www.salvomolinaro.com/2010/01/15/consiglio-sul-passaggio-a-reflex-conviene/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salvomolinaro.com/2010/01/15/consiglio-sul-passaggio-a-reflex-conviene/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Jan 2010 21:29:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Salvo Molinaro</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Salvo risponde]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[17-50]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[18-105 vr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[d5000]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nikon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reflex]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tamron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[zoom]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salvomolinaro.com/?p=346</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Lorenzo Giombini scrive: Ciao Salvo. Volevo sostituire la mia nikon coolpix 7.1 con una reflex Nikon D5000 con obiettivo 18-105 in modo da avere anche un po&#8217; di zoom . Premetto che non sono un esperto di fotografia, ma un amatore, tu me la consiglieresti ?Grazie e ciao Salvo risponde: Ciao Lorenzo e grazie per]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salvomolinaro.com/2010/01/15/consiglio-sul-passaggio-a-reflex-conviene/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tamron 17-50 vc su nikon d300s</title>
		<link>http://www.salvomolinaro.com/2010/01/15/tamron-17-50-vc-su-nikon-d300s/</link>
		<comments>http://www.salvomolinaro.com/2010/01/15/tamron-17-50-vc-su-nikon-d300s/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 Jan 2010 23:45:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Salvo Molinaro</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Salvo risponde]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[17-50]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[d300s]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[front focus]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nikkor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nikon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[polyphoto]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tamron]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vc]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.salvomolinaro.com/?p=344</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Ciao Salvo, ho letto la tua recensione sul tamron in oggetto,ho acquistato un Tamron 17-50 f2.8 VC per nikon (ho una d300),sono un fotoamatore e mi piace fare ritratti, spesso la sera, a casa di amici, ed uso di solito un nikon af-s 50 f1.4,ho acquistato il tamron per avere uno zoom più ampio abbastanza]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.salvomolinaro.com/2010/01/15/tamron-17-50-vc-su-nikon-d300s/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
